RSS

Dawkins and Chopra

11 Nov

Unfortunately, I missed the live stream of a debate between Richard Dawkins and Deepak Chopra this weekend. I made the faulty assumption that I would be able to view / listen to it later, but for some reason that I don’t understand, youtube has blocked replay of this event in the United States. I’ve been assured that there was nothing particularly groundbreaking in this event…

Chopra says, “Blah blah, quantum, blah blah blah, consciousness, other way of knowing…”

Dawkins replies, ” What in God’s name are you talking about?”

A clip of a prior interaction between the two can be found at:

As my previous post hints, there is a problem in the communication of science to the public. It may be added that there is a deep valley between the way that scientists speak and the way that the public – or more importantly, the way some public personalities like Chopra- speaks.

Dawkins can be heard in the video clip above trying to make sense of Chopra’s language. Is he speaking in metaphor or does he mean to speak literally?

Advertisements
 
1 Comment

Posted by on November 11, 2013 in Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

One response to “Dawkins and Chopra

  1. Mehron

    November 11, 2013 at 11:22 pm

    Chopra also asserted several times that cells and atoms have “awareness”, which was one of the things that made Dawkins very red in the face.

    Anyway, maybe this will be of interest until you get to see the Dawkins vs. Chopra version:
    Shorter edit: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09UmufmfSLc
    Full version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi2IC6e5DUY

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: