RSS

“Life is nothing but an electron looking for a place to rest”

31 Aug

ImagePhysics -> Chemistry -> Biology

The Smithsonian Magazine has an article this week proposing that we consider Mars as the origin of Terrestrial Life. This notion stems from Steven Benner’s Four Paradoxes: The Tar Paradox, The Water Paradox, The Single Biopolymer Paradox and The Probability Paradox. Each of these is described in the abstract of his work, and do add up to a possible alternative for life’s origin. However, as compelling as his arguments may be, the origin of life will always be a mystery veiled in time. Even if we were to find evidence of life on Mars that is very much like that on Earth, it would be difficult to say whether Terrestrial life was the origin of Martian life, or vice versa.

Another problem I have with tracing the origins of life off-planet is that it does not solve anything, but merely relocates the source. So it’s not that I feel that Benner’s work is uninteresting or unworthy of consideration, but presently, Ockham’s razor precludes Imageseriously considering extra-terrestrial origins without a good deal more hard evidence. Further,  relocating the source or life’s origin does little to change how we think about  origins. Regardless or where life started, it is still highly probably that it began with RNA, a unique molecule in that even today it serves dual roles as an information-carrying molecule and a structural one that often has enzymatic function. And, that the addition of the more stable , DNA molecule as the primary source of information happened later – as adding protein synthesis also did for providing an alternative structural / functional molecule. 

Evolution of the Central Dogma?

                                                              RNA

                        DNA -> RNA                                                  RNA -> Protein

                                                  DNA -> RNA -> Protein

About these ads
 
2 Comments

Posted by on August 31, 2013 in Uncategorized

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 responses to ““Life is nothing but an electron looking for a place to rest”

  1. Erik Andrulis

    September 3, 2013 at 1:48 pm

    I agree with your skepticism towards pushing the problem off the planet. You’d still have to explain where *that* life came from.

    “However, as compelling as his arguments may be, the origin of life will always be a mystery veiled in time.”

    Perhaps so, if one abides by convention. But, seeking the answer to that mystery, I devised an empirically consistent theory.

    Oh, and by the way, the central dogma is wrong; has been for a long time.

     
  2. downhousesoftware

    September 3, 2013 at 5:27 pm

    Thanks for the comment, Eric.
    Please share. I find it difficult to imagine any explanation offering more than a decent model within which life is possible.
    I’m also interested to hear what you are referring to with respect to the Central Dogma. I agree that there are examples where the Central Dogma fails, but as it’s an excellent rule of thumb for tracing information through a cell.

    Sincerely,

    Jack

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 997 other followers

%d bloggers like this: